How to Build the Ideal DevOps Team Structure ITPro Today: IT News, How-Tos, Trends, Case Studies, Career Tips, More

There’s a constant need to go through form, norm, storm, and perform as part of the team lifecycle. We beg, borrow and steal, to get the right people to work on a project. But, what ends up happening here is that everyone is working on several projects at once, meaning there’s devops team structure not much talent left for new projects. With DevOps, some structures are more conducive to these goals than others. Having had a few months to reflect on the diagrams, I can see where you’re coming from, and I think I will write a follow-up post to clarify some ideas.

  • It assumes putting one or several DevOps engineers in charge of all the operations and deployment processes.
  • The DevOps Silo (Anti-Type B) typically results from a manager or exec deciding that they “need a bit of this DevOps thing” and starting a ‘DevOps team’ (probably full of people known as ‘a DevOp‘).
  • Without a DevOps approach, there are often problems between releasing new features and stability.
  • You should always keep an eye for the people who have the fire to learn new things and the capability to evolve themselves so as to fit into a new role easily within the development team.
  • Showcase your business effectively on the web by leveraging our web development solutions formed to suit your business needs.

This is a bit more of an expanded role compared to the traditional developer, which was mostly concerned with just writing code. A DevOps pilot team can work as a bridge between silos for a limited amount of time, as long as their focus is bringing the silos together and their long-term goal is making themselves unnecessary. But once DevOps has become mission critical, the tools and processes being developed and used must themselves be maintained and treated as a project, making a pipeline for your pipeline. The first two steps are primarily necessary in the establishment of the DevOps team structure in the beginning phase of the DevOps journey.

It provides a service to its customers, in most cases, they are the local development team, but can be broader teams such as quality, leadership, and then consuming teams that consume the Software. Some organisations, particularly smaller ones, might not have the finances, experience, or staff to take a lead on the operational aspects of the software they produce. DevOps does not of course suggest you to break and reorganize all ongoing projects at your organization in one go. A non-disruptive, but still impactful way of adapting your teams for DevOps methodology is to inject functional experts into projects teams.

DevOps Organization Structure 2: Dev and Ops Collaboration

The DevOps Evangelist is the change agent responsible for owning and delivering change toward a DevOps culture. The DevOps Evangelist is responsible for ensuring the success and implementation of all DevOps processes and team identity. My Views may start to diverge here from other articles in some capacities, but remember the key thing here is looking at the ability to evolve. Setting up good teams is not about creating one bottleneck, but ensuring a role where people can grow, learn and adapt.

ideal devops team structure

This will involve giving them more autonomy than I imagine a lot of companies would feel comfortable with allowing. Trust will be crucial to letting these teams organize themselves and learn what is effective and what needs more effective implementation next time, but that’s the price of doing business. While some companies had years to ease into a distributed workforce, a lot of companies did not have that luxury.

Automation implementation

The DevOps engineer is usually a “jack of all trades” who has knowledge and experience with both development and operations. The role requires an individual who can adapt to new technologies and is willing to embrace new challenges in development, such as cloud infrastructure. By building an SRE team, then, businesses get something very similar to a stand-alone DevOps team that exists alongside development and IT operations.

ideal devops team structure

To achieve this, all team members should be able to share ideas, discuss product features and resolve problems together. All DevOps team members should also learn from each other and pick up skills in all product functions. One of the most significant factors to DevOps success is fostering a culture of teamwork and collaboration within your teams. A strong DevOps practitioner should possess a solid technical foundation, effective communication skills, a collaborative mindset, and the ability to adapt. Having a balance of these traits is crucial, rather than just a comprehensive knowledge of Kubernetes or Git. However, having both technical expertise and interpersonal skills is a definite plus.

DevOps Isn’t a Team (Except When It Is)

The Ops engineers now get to call themselves SREs but little else has changed. Devs still throw software that is only ‘feature-complete’ over the wall to SREs. Software operability still suffers because Devs are no closer to actually running the software that they build, and the SREs still don’t have time to engage with Devs to fix problems when they arise. In this anti-type the organization shows lack of appreciation for the importance and skills required for effective IT operations. In particular, the value of Ops is diminished because it’s treated as an annoyance for Devs .

ideal devops team structure

By exploring the strengths and weaknesses of these team structures (or ‘topologies’), we can identify the team structure which might work best for DevOps practices in our own organisations, taking into account Conway’s Law. AWS offers services that assist you in implementing DevOps at your organization. These solutions automate tedious activities, help teams manage complicated settings at scale, and keep engineers in charge of DevOps’ high velocity. In this team structure, a distinct “DevOps” team is set up within a development team to act as a source of expertise for the development team. The key to successful DevOps is collaboration and clear team roles – and that requires a clear DevOps team structure. These DevOps teams should constitute generalist full-stack software engineers which are able to self-sufficiently cover all phases of software engineering life cycle from design to maintenance.

Type 1: Smooth Collaboration

In the long run, this will not only create a DevOps team structure based on a specific objective or goal, but also increase visibility amongst team members and allow them to have a sense of purpose in their day-to-day work. As DevOps is gaining popularity, organizations are opting for a DevOps team instead of a regular tech team. Blameless provides an excellent platform for DevOps and SRE teams to align their interests and work together towards making decisions and bringing change! DevOps teams are made up of people who are skilled in both development and operations.

Even in its early stage, this initiative improved the team morale because both Java and PL/SQL experts started working for the success of their joint product team instead of motives of their past functional silos. As they built a loosely-coupled architecture, now the impact of changes are easier to identify, changes are easier and quicker to implement and defects are more straightforward to locate and fix. As a result, average lead time of new features reduced from 4 months to 3 weeks, and incident queue of the team is now almost empty, so they profit from this free capacity by further reviewing, refactoring and improving their codebase. A C4E enables organizations to transform their IT teams into strategic business partners, as opposed to traditional technology functions.

Leverage insights from the Puppet 2021 State of DevOps Report

I’d suggest looking at this particular number often and making sure it aligns with the goal of your company. Many research shows that when people have little sense of autonomy and control in their work, there is more stress and more burnout. One way DevOps leaders can help fight burnout is to create more autonomy in their teams and not to impose restrictions on them.

Incident Management Tool Checklist

Maybe that person can switch into a more ops-focused role in your new organization. While a team structure that facilities collaboration and visibility between Dev and Ops teams is important, the use of automation tools is also necessary for an effective DevOps life cycle, the company explained. The way teams build software can also help facilitate a successful DevOps Model, GitLab explained. For instance, microservices and containers enable a DevOps model that iterates quickly and offers more autonomy within certain groups. Successful DevOps companies structure themselves around multiple small teams that are responsible for a small part of the system.

Time-consuming updates and fixes

Furthermore, Ops will be tasked with the responsibility of generating and cultivating new solutions. These solutions will be targeted at the reduction of development and deployment times. Every new iteration of the code or every new feature pushed runs the risk of introducing bugs and incompatibilities issues. Measuring the number of these types of issues introduced with every push can help you understand the effectiveness of your team. If your team uses Github, you can learn more about this Github integration to see how to set this up for your team. This refers to the number of deployments your team will be doing each day.

Cloud roadmap

DevOps frameworks operate at breakneck speed, evolving and developing, and are essential to efficiently enabling, testing, monitoring, and releasing features. This page gives you a complete look at your runtime and will notify you if your product is down. This can help SRE teams in particular as error budgets can be judged at a glance.

Provide the infrastructure and automation tools that the business developers require for releasing and supporting the code themselves. IT support is another important team that should be integrated into the DevOps lifecycle. It should be automated to match the speed and scale of agile development. When developers push code to production, they can convey known errors to the support team. Similarly, Kbs related to incidents and problems should be communicated to all members so that everyone is educated about issues and incidents.

So, look for hard skills such as IT background, virtualization expertise, system build knowledge, etc. as well as soft skills such as communication, service-orientation, team person, and the value he offers to the organization. With infrastructure as code increasingly gaining momentum, the thin line between development and operations is quickly waning off. The current DevOps team structure contains people who are skilled in coding and operations.

DevOps is a way of creating software that combines Agile methods and ideas, such as using technology to make things faster and having development and operations teams work together more effectively. Instead of having separate teams for development, UI/UX, QA, and operations, you should bring this talent together into a cross-functional team. A cross-functional setup can ensure that all aspects of the software development lifecycle are considered and addressed. The DevOps approach involves overseeing every stage of the software development process, including planning, development, integration, testing, deployment, and operations. DevOps is an increasingly popular way of developing software that brings both development and operations teams together to make sure products are delivered quickly and efficiently.

This participation allows developers to start understanding the frustrations of being called in the middle of the night and struggling while foggy-eyed and caffeine-deprived to fix a bug that’s impacting customers. Operations folks also begin to trust your developers’ commitment to their work. When you embrace change management, you want a system that focuses on continuous process improvement. When an organization is structured around OKRs it creates a culture of trust. Unlike structures that base themselves around knowledge silos, knowledge sharing becomes a core component with OKRs.